Famous First Lines: Hamlet

72

By Teresa McGurk

the engraving by Henry Selous (1803-1890)
the engraving by Henry Selous (1803-1890)
Olivier, of course
Olivier, of course

A Framework not of his own making

It is significant that several other characters get to speak (at great length, and -- depending on the production -- in a mysteriously boring manner) before Hamlet gets a word in (under his breath, too). He is absent in the first scene, which takes place on the battlements -- outside of the court, the political center of the realm, and which discusses recent history and regional socio-political upheavals (that little fracas with Norway, for instance) before getting to the juicy stuff (A ghost! Where? There! Yikes!).

Hamlet is also significantly absent for many lines in Scene Two, while Claudius drones on (and on) about how it's just too bad his brother went and died and all, and how no one opposed his own nomination for the crown (yes, Denmark had an elected monarchy at the time), so no one can complain about it now.

The facts are all open before us: the machinery of state has been moving, without Hamlet's contribution. In fact, he's been absent, away at school (Wittenburg -- that school for famous fictional characters -- yep: Marlowe's Dr. Faustus studied there, too), so has missed his father's death, coming home for the funeral and the swiftly following marriage of Claudius and Gertrude.

But now the time is "out of joint" (as Hamlet succinctly phrases it himself). The clockwork of Elsinore has had a spanner thrown into the works, and the portents are ominous: young Fortinbras of Norway looks like taking advantage of the transitional state of Denmark until he is bribed into invading Poland instead, and oh! yeah -- Hamlet, senior is haunting the battlements in full armor, because his murdered soul is in limbo. There's something rotten in the state of Denmark, as somebody observes at the time.

Those are the outward circumstances which the audience learns of before seeing Hamlet. Now, Hamlet's state of mind is complicated. Let's make a list of what has just happened to him in the space of two months:

  • his father has died unexpectedly (Junior doesn't know for a fact yet that it's murder)
  • his mother has married Claudius immediately (in Elizabethan England this was still considered a form of incest -- to marry your brother's widow -- and was the technicality on which Henry VIII was able to have his marriage with Catherine of Aragón annulled).
  • he doesn't understand why his mother has married so quickly -- a fact that we need to linger over for a while, as it helps us understand the whole play. The fact that Shakespeare doesn't tell us why Gertrude has rushed "twixt incestuous sheets" with Uncle Claudius isn't important: what matters for the audience viewing the play is that an insurmountable stack of circumstance is piled up all around Hamlet and he can't comprehend the individual events when he tries to analyze them. This one is key, as it has shattered his whole idea of home/ parents/ happy childhood. What Hamlet does next is demonize Claudius and demean his mother. He blames his mother for shifting her affections from his father (who becomes god-like in Hamlet's descriptions of him) to a "bloat toad." Claudius deserves the insult. We simply don't know whether or not Gertrude deserves it, too (although she does talk about her "o'er hasty marriage"). Hamlet was excluded from her decision to marry.
  • Claudius is now the king. Another fact we can examine in some detail. Young Prince Hamlet would have been brought up to believe that he would be king after Hamlet senior. To arrive home to find that someone else is now wearing the crown emphasizes Hamlet's exclusion from political matters at Elsinore.
  • Ophelia has been instructed not to talk to Hamlet. Bummer. We learn later that Hamlet really did have feelings for the girl; what's important now, though, is the fact that again he is being excluded

So when does Hamlet say something?

To add insult to injury, Claudius talks to Laertes (Ophelia's brother) before even acknowledging Hamlet's presence. But finally, when all other affairs have been addressed, he turns to his nephew:

  • But now, my cousin Hamlet, and my son-
  • Hamlet. [aside] A little more than kin, and less than kind!

"Cousin" here is an Elizabethan term for general kinship, not necessarily as specific as "nephew." "Son" here is, of course, "step-son." Hamlet's comment is indirect. So is everything he does in this play. He takes the indirect route to prove that Claudius killed his father (by putting on a play and feigning madness -- not really the process they follow in Law and Order or CSI Miami), not killing Claudius when he has a real opportunity (while Claudius is praying) because that would have sent his uncle's soul to heaven (according to the Elizabethan understanding of these matters).

The comment is sarcastic, to say the least. If we consider sarcasm to be representative of Hamlet's frustrated aggression at the circumstances it's little wonder. Even the final resolution of the tragedy is rigged by Claudius and Laertes, who set up a poisoned-sword tournament, otherwise the play never would have ended. . . .

So Hamlet's first words in the play are a comment on the action, rather than being direct involvement in the action; specifically a sarky aside about his uncle. Interestingly, he is extremely perceptive when it comes to knowing when other people are being less than direct -- he knows Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are lying to him about the reason for their visit; he knows that Ophelia has been "planted" for him to discover (in the scene where she tries to give him back the gifts he gave her) and that Polonius and probably Claudius, too, are spying on him; he suspects enough about the attempted trip to England to switch the letters (resulting in the deaths of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern). He is a director, rather than an actor in, his own drama. Unfortunately, the framework of the play is an Italianate Revenge Tragedy and Hamlet is not a revenge hero. He's way too cerebral.

Hamlet (1996)
Amazon Price: $2.99
Hamlet
Amazon Price: $3.97
List Price: $14.96
William Shakespeare's Hamlet (Two-Disc Special Edition)
Amazon Price: $10.49
List Price: $26.99
dohn121 profile image

dohn121 Level 3 Commenter 2 years ago

The featured Hamlet movie is by far the best rendition of Shakespeare's most famous play caught on film. An excellent choice. Among the many faults of Claudius, his biggest by far was his failure to murder Hamlet when he had the chance (obviously then, the play would not be nearly as good!).

Rochelle Frank profile image

Rochelle Frank 2 years ago

Hamlet: A man of few words, yet some very memorable ones.

This reminds me of the story about the actor who tried to bequeath his skull to the Royal Shakespeare Company so he could play the part of Yorick after his death. Alas.

William F. Torpey profile image

William F. Torpey Level 2 Commenter 2 years ago

The changing of the guard at Elsinore was an interesting opening of the play. Hamlet's story has been my all-time favorite from the day my mother brought me to the movies to see Laurence Olivier's great performance. For me, there was never a dull moment from start to finish.

Teresa McGurk profile image

Teresa McGurk Hub Author 2 years ago

Dohn -- I really do like the Olivier version best, too. Thanks for coming by.

Rochelle -- 'a was a fellow of infinite jest, indeed.

William -- glad you liked the movie so much. The worst version I've ever seen was a movie in Catalan. It lasted over four hours. I thought I would lose my mind at one point. . .

Janetta 2 years ago

Oh, how I do love Hamlet. My favorite of the Shakespeare plays :) Everything uttered from Hamlets mouth was loaded with meaning.

Teresa McGurk profile image

Teresa McGurk Hub Author 2 years ago

Hey, Janetta -- thanks for coming by.

wesleycox profile image

wesleycox Level 2 Commenter 2 years ago

I read hamlet in high school, had a bit of trouble with it then but reading this hub, I understand what was going on now. Thanks

Elena. profile image

Elena. Level 1 Commenter 2 years ago

I've seen Hamlet played like five times (3 of them crappy BTW), seen the movie I don't know how many times and read the play like ten times and I never looked at Hamlet in quite this light before! Thanks for the eye opener, Prof! Need I add this was an awesome read? BESOS!

Teresa McGurk profile image

Teresa McGurk Hub Author 2 years ago

Hey Wesley -- glad this made sense. Thanks for stopping by.

Elena, thanks for the lovely compliment, and for coming by to read. Besos back at ya!

2patricias profile image

2patricias Level 5 Commenter 2 years ago

Yet another jewel in your set of 'first line' Hubs.

Hamlet was a leap forward for Shakespeare, because the main character talks to himself quite a lot, so the audience are let in on what he is thinking. We are used to 'psychological' plays now, but this must have been a big surprise for the Elizbethan audience.

Thanks for another entertaining Hub.

ethel smith profile image

ethel smith Level 3 Commenter 2 years ago

Ah Alas and all that

Ivan the Terrible profile image

Ivan the Terrible 2 years ago

Olivier's Hamlet, and The Seventh Seal are two among my four favorite B&W movies, along with Yojimbo and The Seven Samurai by Kurosawa.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(1948_film)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seventh_Seal

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yojimbo_(film)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Samurai

Teresa McGurk profile image

Teresa McGurk Hub Author 2 years ago

Hey 2pats - yes indeed. While it was in vogue to have a mad character (c.f. Thomas Kyd's The Spanish Tragedy, which was the most popular play in London during the 1592 winter season), what Shakespeare added to the mix was a logical, realistic dimension to Hamlet's distraught demeanor which comes out rationally in his monologues (seven of 'em! More than in any other play!). No wonder Hamlet has been called the first "modern" character in a play; and no wonder the play is so long, as it is about hesitation. I forgot to complete the couplet I started to quote: "the time is out of joint," says Hamlet, and then continues "O, cursed spite/ that ever I was born to set it right." Why me?!? he wails; and we gotta admit he has a point.

Ethel - lol; do I detect a note of levity?

Ivan -- great movie picks; well, I haven't seen Yojimbo, so I must look for it. The others are superb. Thanks for coming by.

Paraglider profile image

Paraglider 2 years ago

Ophelia was a dainty little maid,

Who loved a very melancholy Dane;

Whose affection of the heart, so it is said,

Preceded his affection of the brain.

Heir-apparent to the Crown,

He thought lightly of her passion,

Having wandered up and down,

In an incoherent fashion,

When she found he wouldn't wed her

In a river, in a meadder,

Took a header, and a deader

Was Ophelia!

Ophelia to ger sex was a disgrace,

Whom nobody could feel compassion for.

Ophelia should have gone to Ely Place

To consult an eminent solicitor.

When such promises as these

Breaks a suitor, rich and regal,

Why, substantial damages

Is the panacea legal -

From a jury - son of Adam,

Though as stony as Macadam,

Maid or madam, she's have had 'em

Would Ophelia!

There's a venerable proverb in my mind,

Which applies to this catastrophe, I think,

To a horse who is unfortunately blind

Any nod is just as good as any wink.

Opportunity I'll seize

Of avoiding any error;

Of substantial damages

I have always had a terror.

That calamity to parry

Not a moment will I tarry,

Off I'll carry and I'll marry

Poor Ophelia!

(W.S. Gilbert - thought you might like it ;)

Teresa McGurk profile image

Teresa McGurk Hub Author 2 years ago

LOL "having wandered up and down/ in an incoherent fashion" -- love it -- thank you, PG, wondermous!

Paraglider profile image

Paraglider 2 years ago

It comes from "The Mountebanks". Gilbert had minor successes with other composers, just as Sullivan had, with other lyricists. Together, they were dangerous magic, like John Lennon and that Paul bloke. My earlier problem with Hamlet was that I only knew him through Shakespeare, while with Caesar, Antony and Cleo, Coriodoodah, all the Henries and Richards, the plays were add-ons to the history I already knew. It didn't matter with the comedies, but Hamlet seemed like an imposition - do I really need to know about this guy? Does that make sense?

Teresa McGurk profile image

Teresa McGurk Hub Author 2 years ago

Maybe it's because a lot of academics take Hamlet so (too) seriously? You know, so self-consciously-I'm-so-intellectual-ly serious that they almost Polonius-ize themselves and the play itself? (Coriodoodah!) Once I started seeing the play in human terms (rather than intellectual) I really began to be fascinated by the set-up and Hamlet's plight (and Ophelia's, and Gertrude's). I understand what you mean about the historical figures; and so it was with Plutarch's Lives, too.

Amanda Severn profile image

Amanda Severn Level 3 Commenter 2 years ago

I've seen Hamlet a couple of times, and although it has some great, truly memorable lines, it's far from my favourite Shakespeare play. Boy, is Hamlet one depressing guy! He and Ophelia should have said 'stuff the lot of you!' and legged it off to somewhere where they could have got it together without family interference. I suppose that wouldn't have made too much of a play to be fair, and Millais would never have painted that gorgeous picture of Lizzie Siddal in the bath, but still...

RGraf profile image

RGraf 2 years ago

Hamlet. The more I read and watch the more I love that play. It is so much more deep than you first imagine. To say it is complicated and intricate is an understatement by some.

thank you for planting the yearning to read it again.

Teresa McGurk profile image

Teresa McGurk Hub Author 2 years ago

Hey, Amanda - thanks for coming by. Yes, trust Ophelia to be just about the only tragic heroine who ever listens to her father instead of doing what she wants!

RGraf -- Act Five still blows me away; Hamlet's musings on providence and death are simply superb. Thanks for coming by.

Iphigenia 2 years ago

As ever - another of your literary hubs that make me want to revisit an old favourite. This is certainly one of the most complex plays ever written - the revenge theme helps with the complexity;

I played Ophelia once but now I'm closer to Gertrude's age she has become more intriguing - "seeming virtuous" queen or pragmatic woman of the world?

Teresa McGurk profile image

Teresa McGurk Hub Author 2 years ago

I've played Gertrude and while I used to think she was merely stupid (!) I now believe she may not really have had much choice but let Claudius muscle his smiling way ("that one may smile, and smile, and be a villain")into the kingship. Her concern for her son is apparent in her language, as is her fondness for Ophelia ("sweets for the sweet"). She simply does not see Claudius for what he really is. But that's just my take on her character -- the fact is that Shakespeare did not write her with any more complexity than concerned mother. She mentions their "o'er hasty marriage" -- I do think she is well aware that it is not the best way to have handled the situation. She does not profess love for Claudius, openly disobeying him when she drinks from the poisoned cup.

shamelabboush profile image

shamelabboush Level 1 Commenter 2 years ago

Indeed, Hesitation was his BIG mistake! The major reason of his tragic downfall. He kept on procrastinating and delaying the action till the very end when he was stabbed and poisoned! Very informative article dear, thanks.

Teresa McGurk profile image

Teresa McGurk Hub Author 2 years ago

Thanks for coming by and reading, Shamel.

tonymac04 profile image

tonymac04 2 years ago

Wonderful stuff indeed, Teresa. Thanks for such a lively and human take on a gfreat play. I loved the spin-off Rosenwhatsit and Guildenwho are dead also!

Love and peace

Tony

Paradise7 profile image

Paradise7 Level 7 Commenter 2 years ago

Oh, good job! Good blog--I'm going to read more of you now that I've discovered you. I like that play, but I like the character of Ophelia a lot better than that of Hamlet. But then, Hamlet's indecisiveness is the reason the play is so gripping. Everyone is leaning forward, wishing to put different words in his mouth, saying under his/her breath, no, no, go ahead, do it, just kill the son of a whatnot.

When Shakespeare was writing this play, I've always wondered--was he experimenting a bit? Was he trying on a different way to frame a story, giving us so much background before the story really begins, extending the set-up, creating more tension by not introducing the main character right away? Like any writer, Shakespeare developed as he went along; he grew as a writer by writing. His impeccable sense of the dramatic led him to glory, but there's always, even in his heaviest dramas, a saving grace of saucy wit when you least expect it.

I almost think the ghost was a bit of extremely sly wit on Shakespeare's part, but it thrills me nonetheless for all that.

cdub77 profile image

cdub77 Level 1 Commenter 19 months ago

This is the first of your 'First Lines' hubs I've read, but am now excited to read more. I've written a hub on the linguistics in Hamlet. This play is definitely a great one. Nice to see this writing on HubPages!

Pamela Kinnaird W profile image

Pamela Kinnaird W Level 6 Commenter 2 days ago

Wow, quite an introduction. This is amazing. It's over my head, but very interesting.

Submit a Comment
You Must Sign In To Comment

To comment on this Hub, you must sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages account.

Please wait working